Ford Committed to Improving Fuel Efficiency of Vehicles and Consumers
By Scott Doggett August 28, 2008
Right, Todd Cook, eco-driver extraordinaire.
By Scott Doggett, Contributor
I'm a non-mechanical hypermiler. I do everything short of modifying my car to eek out as many miles from a tank of gasoline as is humanly possible.
So when Ford Motor Co. asked me if I'd like to attend an eco-driving class they were hosting in Phoenix yesterday to learn how I could become a more fuel-efficient driver, I quickly agreed.
It's them who would learn from me, I thought. The so-called class is just more green-washing event put on by an automaker that was slow to get with the high-MPG program. So I thought.
And I was dead wrong. It was I who had much to learn about hypermiling -- or as Ford prefers, eco-driving.
There were maybe a dozen journalists in the class and nearly as many people there from Ford. We learned that during the preceding days, Ford had posted an ad on craigslist inviting Phoenix-area residents to evaluate a few vehicles and earn $125 for their trouble.
A diverse group of 48 people participated, only Ford wasn't primarily interested in what the 48 thought of the vehicles. Rather, Ford wanted to see whether or not they could be taught to drive very fuel efficiently in a short period of time.
The participants adhered to an 11.6-mile route, seven miles on 25- and 35-mile-an-hour streets through residential and commercial neighborhoods and 4.6 miles on a fast stretch of Interstate 10. They drove four vehicles: a 2008 Ford Fusion, a 2009 Ford Flex, a 2008 F-150, and a 2009 Lincoln MKS AWD.
Seated beside each participant was a Ford eco-driving trainer, only the participants didn't know that initially. Rather, they were led to believe that the trainers were researchers tasked with recording the participants' likes and dislikes regarding the four vehicles.
But every time a participant completed the route, his or her completion time and fuel economy were carefully logged. Beginning with the second trip along the same route, the trainers began teaching the motorists how to use less fuel while covering the same ground.
Before telling the journalists how the group fared, each of us was assigned a trainer and, using the same vehicles the craigslist respondents had driven, we covered the same ground, twice.
My Turn
With Ford eco-driving trainer Todd Cook seated beside me in the F-150 pickup, I silently vowed to wow him with my hypermiling skills. I kept the truck at or below posted speed limits, avoided jack-rabbit starts like the plague, cruised to stoplights, avoided braking whenever possible.
The F-150 I drove was EPA rated for 13 miles per gallon in the city, 17 on the highway and 14 combined. Most people believe EPA mileage estimates can only be achieved under optimum conditions. Most people don't expect their fuel economy to be as good as the EPA suggests.
But I completed that first run in 24 minutes and 39 seconds and -- more importantly -- I did it getting a combined 16.6 mpg. That's 2½ miles per gallon better than the EPA's combined fuel-economy estimate for the truck.
As I pulled out of a parking lot at the start of the second trip, Cook said, "You've got happy feet." Although I was hardly gunning the throttle, he'd noticed that I was pushing down, then letting up, pushing down, letting up. Not dramatically, but he could feel it.
Instead of doing that, my feet should be like the smoothest cruise control, he said. They should be gradually accelerating and gradually decelerating when I'm trying to maintain a certain speed on roads that aren't perfectly flat or straight as an arrow.
No Omelet
Treat the throttle as if there's an egg behind it that you don't want to break, he said. Give it gas, but gently, gently. When we spied a traffic light that wasn't likely to be green for us at our current rate of speed, he instructed me to take my foot off the throttle altogether. No use putting the pedal to the metal to get to a red light.
And when we reached a light that, judging from crosswalk signals, was likely to remain red a while, he instructed me to turn the ignition key far enough that the engine died but the radio and other electronic devices stayed on.
He drew my attention to a cross-walk box. When it got down to 2 seconds before I would receive a green light, he told me to turn the key and start the engine. That practice is less wasteful gas-wise than idling for 30 or more seconds, he said.
Cook showed me how to keep the engine under 2,000 rpm all the time, and he taught me to give gas near the end of a downhill stretch and allow the truck's momentum to carry the vehicle at least part way up the next hill before accelerating. Previously, I had been cruising all the way down hills and applying gas at the bottom of the next hill. No good, he said. I didn't know.
Short of it is that my combined mileage rose from 16.6 mpg on the first trip to 17.4 mpg on the second. That's a 5-percent improvement. And instead of going slower, I actually made the second trip in 50 fewer seconds than the first. Had I made a third trip on that course I have no doubt I could have squeezed another mile per gallon out of the fuel I used for even greater savings.
We Rule
My results were exceptional. Most of the journalists achieved mileage improvements in excess of 20 percent because they were so wasteful on their initial run. One of the other reporters saw his fuel economy improve 24 percent between the first trip and the second.
Curt Magleby, Ford's director of U.S. state and local government relations, told us that the term "eco-driving" was actually coined more than a decade ago by Ford of Germany employees who, with members of the German Road Safety Council, looked for ways the consumer could improve his or her mileage.
As a result of the collaboration, fleet drivers and other groups in Germany intent on reducing their fuel costs can now take government-certified courses that enable them to do just that through behavioral changes such as the ones Cook taught me.
Magleby (pictured, with moustache) said several of the German master trainers traveled to Michigan a few months ago and taught their fuel-saving techniques to Cook and the other trainers who just taught us journalists what they'd learned.
Ford is currently speaking with fleet owners in the U.S. about the benefits of eco-driving, Magleby said, adding that he hopes eco-driving will be incorporated into driving-school programs across the nation.
"We (at Ford) are committed to improving the fuel economy of our vehicles," he said. "We are also committed to looking for alternative fuels, for renewable fuels."
But there are a lot of things consumers can be doing right now that would save them money at the pump and help free America of it dependence on foreign oil, he said. All that's needed is replacing some bad driving habits with some good ones.
Amen to that.
LEAVE A COMMENT
Click here to comment on this entry.Good job Ford! The problem isn't just that most folks don't know that they can do so much better. Many also aren't willing to make some or any of the compromises necessary. For instance- travelling 70+ mph on the interstates versus 65. Even driving as you were taught, the lower speed is more fuel efficient (around the same 5% that you saved, at least with most GM vehicles I've owned in the past six years or so- gearing / vehicle size / shape affect the ideal speed too).
One of my coworkers has at least made some compromise though. I live near him so we travel the same route. After speaking with me, about my results he now drives 70 or 75 in a 65 for his roughly 25 miles each way to and from work. He used to drive 80-85. The result was that he went from having me get better fuel economy in a full sized 4x4 Chevrolet Avalanche than he was getting from his Dodge minivan to picking up about 1 mpg better than I get. He was getting 18 mpg or so, while I routinely was getting 19 to just over 20 (20.9 was common). Afterwards he was getting 21 to 22.
So a lot of the whining for more fuel efficient vehicles by folks who WON'T attempt to drive more efficiently annoys me. If they'd make the most of what they already have, they might be surprised. And the ones that make me laugh are the Prius drivers doing 80+ on my daily commute. Exactly how much are they saving in fuel economy over the Corolla by having a hybrid and driving it like that?
Kudos to Ford. The trick is how to make the information more widely known. The most effective option would be to make it a part of the test to obtain a drivers license or a renewal, but that would probably be difficult to implement given the pastiche of state laws and requirements already on the books.
Jerry, you're right that most folks wouldn't be willing to make the compromises required to get good fuel economy.....not unless gas hit $8/gal. So I think it's best for these guys to buy fuel-efficient cars like Civics and Priuses.
Well, if a Prius owner does 80+ on the highway, he'd at least still get a lot of mileage in the city.......
I never ever turn the engine off while moving. My power steering and brakes are not electric, and I would hate to lose control of the vehicle trying to eek out another tenth of a mpg.
heya greenpony,
ya scared me for a minute there. what i wrote was, "And when we reached a light that, judging from crosswalk signals, was likely to remain red a while, he instructed me to turn the ignition key far enough that the engine died but the radio and other electronic devices stayed on."
i think and hope "reached a light" communicates that we had come to a stop, otherwise i'd had written "as we approached a light." a lot of us already stare at crosswalk signals while we're waiting for the traffic signal to turn green. what todd said was, basically, if the light you're approaching has gone from green to yellow to red, when you reach the light you can feel confident that it's not going to turn green in the next few seconds. so instead of idling, turn the ingition key enough that the engine conks out. then keep your eye on the crosswalk signal. when it's down to 2 seconds, turn the ignition key and start 'er up. that gas-saving technique doesn't really work if you car is carburated, b/c the carburetor will pump a small amount of gas when you turn the ignition key. but that's not the case with newer (i.e. non-carburated) vehicles.
--gotzip
Hi Scott, glad you had a good time and here's to hoping you do well with some or all of what you picked up from us yesterday!
A couple of comments if I may;
First we at Pro Formance Group and Ford prefer to distance ourselves from the term "Hypermiling". We do so as some aspects of this type of driving are downright dangerous. We do not condone drafting and running speeds well under the posted limits which in turn lead to a lot of upset (or injured) drivers. Eco-Driving is certainly about fuel savings but we stress safety and a proper mind set as to when and how to apply the technique. You'll recall I was adamant that we obey common traffic laws and do our best to flow with traffic at all times.
As for concerns of "key off" at intersections it should be stressed that this is but on element of the Eco-Driving experience and is best used only when it makes the most sense to do so and to the comfort level of the user. We generally find that less than 20sec of down time the fuel savings do not warrant the effort. And of course not all cars will react the same with regard to "key off" accessories and re starts so it's a personal choice.
I'd like to also mention that Scott's run and the others were far more limited than our guests and that Scott knew what we were up to before we began. Thus the final results are a bit lower than those of the blind test. I'm certain Scott and the others would have more closely matched the results we achieved with the others if they been introduced to it differently and given more time to practice. With some effort there's an easy 20% on the table for those willing to take it!
We mentioned the Prius a bit as it's a popular alternative. But achieving increases in mileage require more than just a high-mileage vehicle. In fact our own use of the Fusion netted some of the lowest returns as it was already a fuel efficient vehicle. Running a Prius day in and day out driving it like a Mustang GT will certainly not get the numbers claimed. But I'd say a GT owner could nearly match that same Prius drivers numbers with some proper training. It's all about the balance. To to get the most from the vehicle you must also get the most from the driver.
Happy Motoring!
Todd
Hi Todd,
I don't advocate any of the dangerous hypermiling stuff. Just want to be clear on that. Even just obeying the speed limit can get a person into trouble. I believe I told you I had someone point a gun at me for going 55 mph on the Pasadena Freeway. I was in the merging lane, about to take an offramp. Wasn't like I was going 55 in the passing lane -- as if that would justify pointing a gun at another motorist.
Point I really wanted to make here is that having driven with Todd, I believe him when he says a Mustang GT owner might be able to get 40+ mpg if he/she knew how to eco-drive like you do AND if he/she cared to apply what he/she knew. I'm on L.A. Freeways and L.A. streets every day and it saddens me to see how most people drive -- recklessly fast, generally distracted, always feeling they are in some kind of race. Could most of these people change? Sure. Would they if they knew how? I wouldn't bet on it.
--Gotzip
ADD A COMMENT