Congressmen Want 80 Percent of New Vehicles Flex-Fuel Compatible by 2015
By John O'Dell March 19, 2009
Although it contains less energy than gasoline and thus cuts into fuel economy for vehicles that use it, ethanol helps replace gas and that makes it a valuable tool in the national effort to wean ourselves from petroleum-based fuels.
We don't believe it is particularly green, either, but none of this has kept ethanol from being the favored alt fuel of a whole lot of people.
In the latest pro-ethanol move we're aware of, a bipartisan group of congress members has just introduced a bill that would require by 2015 that 80 percent of all new autos and light trucks sold or manufacturers in the U.S. be capable of running on either E85, a blend of 85 percent ethanol and 15 percent gasoline, or M85, a methanol-gasoline blend in the same proportions.
(Methanol, a close cousin of ethanol, is widely used as a racing fuel, primarily for safety reasons - it is less flammable than gasoline. But is has even less energy content than ethanol.)
The measure, H.R. 1476, would require half of the new cars and light trucks sold or built here in 2012 to be E85 or M85 flex-fuel capable, ratcheting up to 80 percent three years later.
The bil is being backed by Reps. Eliot Engel and Steve Israel, New york Democrats, and Republicans Roscoe Bartlett, or Maryland, and Bob Inglis, or South Carolina.
Engel, an ethanol enthusiast who introduced similar legislation last year (it didn't make it into the 2008 energy bill) said he hoped the new measure would become part of an energy legislation package the House is expected to consider later this year.
While automakers routinely oppose mandates, Ford, GM and Chrysler all have said they would make half their fleets flex-fuel capable by 2012. No word on how willing they are to go to the 80 percent mark H.R. 1476 would require of them and of most foreign automakers.
It is not terribly costly to alter gasoline engines at the factory to run on higher levels of ethanol (most gas today is either 5 percent or 10 percent ethanol, which is used as an oxygenating agent); but the alcohol-based fuel is corrosive and can cause problems in vehicles not built to use it in high concentrations.
So far, there are only about 1,900 E85 pumps and a negligible number of methanol pumps in the entire U.S. Ethanol backers say increasing the number of flex-fuel vehicles would encourage development of alternative fuels and a retail distribution system for them.
LEAVE A COMMENT
Ethanol has some evolving to do, but so do most alternative means of propelling your car. There's no reason Ethanol can't become more practical as time passes. As the article indicates, it's easy an inexpensive to make new cars run on Ethanol.
Sounds like a good step to me.
*shrug* I don't know anyone who regularly uses E85 in their flex-fuel vehicle. It's just not cost effective.
Hybrids aren't cost effective. Hydrogen isn't cost effective. EV's aren't cost effective. That's the problem when you go against the established gasoline.
Btw: I do know people that regularly use E85. When gas prices shot up, it was a lot more common. E85 didn't shoot up the same way E10 did, so it was a lot more cost effective.
This is all well and good for new cars, but the average age for a car today is close to 10 years old. A switch to E85 only fuels will choke the older engines.
ADD A COMMENT