Report Will Cast Doubt Upon Likelihood of Rapid Deployment of Plug-in Vehicles
By Scott Doggett September 9, 2010
IHS Cambridge Energy Research Associates is preparing a report that casts doubt on the rapid deployment of the plug-in vehicles, contending they will be hampered by shortages of recharging stations for urban motorists, the subscription news service ClimateWire reported today.
CERA Vice President Larry Makovich said the report, which is scheduled to be released in November, also takes issue with a scenario that foresees millions of plug-in electric vehicles being recharged at night by wind power.
The study will assert that in a number of urban areas where wind or hydro power is not readily available, electric vehicles are likely to be recharged by coal-fired generating plants, whose carbon emissions will substantially undercut the vehicles' climate benefits.
CERA's study will also contend that in the absence of federal policy to tax carbon emissions, wind power will lose ground to natural gas-fired power generation, which should remain relatively cheap because of the huge increase in U.S. natural gas reserves stemming from shale gas development, he told ClimateWire.
Plug-in hybrids and battery-electric vehicles are a crucial part of the Obama administration's long-range scenario for reducing greenhouse gases.
President Obama has set a goal of having 1 million all-electric or hybrid electric-gasoline vehicles on the road by 2015, and the administration has channeled Smart Grid grants to support advanced battery development, charging stations deployment and production facilities for electric cars.
CERA's research indicates that there will be serious economic and logistical obstacles to widespread development of public recharging stations in urban areas - the logical target for electric vehicle deployment because of the shorter distances urban commuters and residents drive each day, Makovich said.
"There are tremendous challenges to implementing electric vehicles in urban settings, particularly in older cities," Makovich said. Cities such as San Francisco have many neighborhoods where a majority of car owners park their cars at the curb, not in garages where plug-in recharging would be convenient and secure.
The most likely customers for all-electric cars are motorists in cities' close-in suburbs, where round-trip daily commuting distances are 35 miles or less, CERA's report will conclude.
In cities such as Detroit, where renewable resources are currently meager, a large-scale increase in electricity use to recharge vehicles is likely to be met by coal power in the foreseeable future, he said. "We're talking about multiple decades before you have a meaningful change to what's on the margin off-peak" for power generation.
LEAVE A COMMENT
Click here to comment on this entry.Even if the power is from *only* coal-fired plants (with their own environmental controls), the cars will still be slightly more CO2 release than if they burned petrol or diesel.
But, when the total United States grid is concerned (coal, NG, nuclear, wind, solar source) and all EV's in America are averaged, they release less CO2 per mile than petrol powered vehicles.
The lowest CO2 per mile would be if all electric power sources were hydro or nuclear, of course. Go Nukes!
http://www.paulchefurka.ca/Electric%20Cars%20and%20CO2.html
While the near-term power mix is less than ideal (though it will improve), EVs will be an important part of achieving US energy independence.
Many of us are eager to stop buying petroleum from countries that despise us!
Is Cambridge Energy Research Associates a trading name of Exxon? What a load of rubbish these reports put out.
EVs uses 1/10th the energy of an ICE powered car. That's 10x EVs running the same mileage on the kWh consumed by a single ICE car...
These oil company stooges also don't seem to grasp that even IF 50% of US electricity is coal fired, by charging EVs over night they're actually making the entire grid more efficient ( i.e power that is generate but wasted can be put to some use other than just keeping street lights on). More system efficiency means cheaper energy!
As for the lack of charging 'infrastructure' what a load of dribble. There is only 100k gasoline stations in the US, that's 1 for every 3000 citizens. How many electrical power points do you think there are in the US? 500M? 1B? So many no-one actually knows!
NASCAR needs to go all-electric. That ought to jump start things.
LOL. CERA !
They are the same ones who thing Peak Oil is a joke and we will have excess oil for a hundred years. Every year they put out reports about oil price & production that is always wrong ...
ADD A COMMENT