Chevrolet Malibu: “Very Important” to GM and Chevy

Ask anyone at General Motors how important the upcoming 2008 Chevrolet Chevymalibu02_pepper_naias_p_1_210 Malibu is and you’ll likely get a rather reserved response.

Like the one Chevrolet General Manager Ed Peper (PEEP-er) gave AutoObserver in an interview Monday: “It’s a very important vehicle for us.”

That’s an understatement.

Still somewhat restrained especially for him, GM Vice Chairman Bob Lutz goes a tad further. In his GM FastLane blog, in which he wrote about his recent "weekend with a Bu," he called its introduction “one of the most important passenger car launches in recent General Motors history.” He added: “We’ve put a lot of blood, sweat and tears into this vehicle.”

GM executives’ caution is understandable and wise, since the automaker has oft been accused of over promising and under delivering. But the launch of the 2008 Chevrolet Malibu is beyond “very important.”

Let us count the reasons why:

1 – Size Matters

Size of the market, that is.

Though the midsize car segment has been shrinking, it is still huge.

Every year, automakers sell between 2.5 million and 3 million midsize cars. It used to be 4 million a year, but with the advent of more choices, including SUVs and now crossovers, midsize car sales and share of the total vehicle market have slipped. Since 2002, midsize car market share has dipped about 16 percent from 18 percent or more a year.

Still, that’s a big slice of the pie.

Or a lot of bread and butter -- as the segment is often called the bread-and-butter for carmakers.

The current generation Malibu has captured only a teensy sliver of that slice of pie. In 2006, Malibu sales totaled 129,596, not even a full factory’s worth. Its share of the vehicle market ran under 1 percent for all but one month of last year, whereas it was over1 percent and even approaching 2 percent in earlier years.

GM executives are reticent about their volume and share goals for the 2008 Malibu. But clearly they are gearing up for significant improvement.

The Malibu is being assembled at GM’s Fairfax, Kansas, factory. But only today, the Detroit Free Press reported that workers at GM’s assembly plant in the Detroit suburb of Orion Township, which builds the Pontiac G6, have spotted Malibu or two rolling down their assembly line, hinting that GM is preparing to add Malibu production at a second location.

2 - Best Sellers List

The best-selling cars in America are midsize cars, and they sell more than 400,000 copies a year.

To hold the title of best-selling car in America gives a manufacturer invaluable bragging rights. What better testament to a product than that buyers voted with their hard-earned cash?

The Toyota Camry has held that title for five consecutive years -- nine times in the past decade, swapping off with the Honda Accord. The last American car to hold the title was the Ford Taurus, from 1992 to 1997 -- the old Taurus, not the newly badged Five Hundred.

Multiply that out year after year, and you’re talking millions of buyers. In fact, Ford, when it announced the resurrection of the Taurus name, provided an interesting statistic: in 21 years, Taurus represented 7 million sales, of which about 3.5 million remain on the roads today.

Malibu has not been on the top 10 list, but clearly, Chevy intends to break into that top 10 list with the Malibu. Chevy’s Peper hinted: “We’ve done a great job with Impala. It’s been a strong midsize car; we think the Malibu is going to be world class.”

Top 10 Best-Selling Vehicles of 2006
Ford F-Series             796,039
Chevrolet Silverado   636,069
Toyota Camry            448,445
Dodge Ram                364,177
Honda Accord            354,441
Toyota Corolla           318,123
Honda Civic               316,638
Chevrolet Impala      289,868
Nissan Altima           232,457
Chevrolet Cobalt      211,449
Source: Automotive News, Edmunds.com

3 – Make It in Midsize; Make it Anywhere

The midsize car market is kind of like the song “New York, New York.” If you can make it there, you can make it anywhere.

Because of the size and importance of the midsize car market, the competition is intense. Everybody plays there, from Suzuki and Kia to Toyota and GM. By Chevy's count, at least 40 nameplates compete in this class.

To rise to the top of the heap, speaks volumes that advertising can’t buy.

The current Malibu didn’t make it there, but the 2008 version is intended to be a contender.

How?

Malibu_turned_right_240 GM started with good bones. The 2008 Malibu is based on GM’s global midsize Epsilon platform that is well proven in other vehicles around the world. It provides a strong body structure for better driving dynamics and is designed for more precise construction. The architecture has been stretched; the new Malibu is more than three inches longer than the current one with six inches more of wheelbase.

GM allowed some of us journalists to test-drive the new Malibu at its proving Malibu_left_facing_240 grounds in Milford, Mich., last week. In fact, they provided the best-selling Toyota Camry to test side-by-side with the Malibu. We’re sworn to secrecy on our driving impressions until Nov. 2 when the car will be in showrooms. Suffice it to say, Chevy may finally have a contender.

But GM recognized good bones aren’t enough. After all, the current Malibu had good bones for its time. The big difference is in the looks. In a class of plain Janes, the current Malibu has been characterized as plain vanilla, at best, and homely, at worst. GM execs rightly decided why not make the Malibu attractive? Duh!

Malibu_face_210 Most noticeable is its new dual-port grille design, which will be the new face of Chevrolet around the world. Another plus is the fact that the car – and GM’s consumer research verifies this – looks more expensive than it is. 

The Malibu’s beauty is beyond skin deep, however. GM, once an interior design laggard, takes a giant step forward with the Malibu_interior_210 Malibu. The interior looks refined and is available with two-tone trim and gauges with blue backlighting. Like the exterior, the interior makes the Malibu look like a more expensive car than it is.

"The vehicle makes a statement in design," Peper told AutoObserver, "and a statement about the future design for Chevrolet exteriors and interiors."

4 – Cutting a Wide Swathe

A car doesn’t get to be best-selling car in America by covering a narrow niche. A midsize car like the Malibu has to cut a wide swathe of demographics, from the young family to the middle-age driver who carries clients but wants some spirit to the retired schoolteacher to everyone in between.

To that end, Chevy is offering the Malibu a variety of ways, as is required in the segment.

The Malibu comes in three equipment levels: the LS, LT and LTZ. All come with standard side curtain airbags and front side airbags, OnStar and XM Satellite radio. It comes with either a 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine or a 3.6-liter V6. A six-speed automatic is standard with the V6; a four-speed automatic comes with the four-cylinder, though a six-speed automatic will be offered with the four-cylinder LTZ – a segment first combo – later in the model year.

In addition, Chevy comes out of the gates with a hybrid version of the Malibu.

5 – The Value Story

In the end, it is the bottom line that counts. The value story. A midsize car has to fit the budget of a young family and the schoolteacher collecting a pension.

Top 10 Least Expensive Midsize Sedans of 2007
Kia Optima  $16,355
Hyundai Sonata $17,195
Chevrolet Malibu $17,215
Pontiac G6  $17,245
Ford Fusion  $17,430
Nissan Altima  $17,950
Chrysler Sebring $18,320
Toyota Camry  $18,470
Honda Accord  $18,625
Mercury Milan $18,905
Source: Edmunds.com

But Chevy’s goal with the 2008 Malibu is to not have the car look cheap. “It has the looks of a $40,000 vehicle for under $20,000,” Chevy’s Peper has said repeatedly since he unveiled the car in January at the Detroit auto show.

Exact pricing hasn’t been announced; it is expected closer to the November launch of the car.

“We’re going to deliver,” insists Peper.

In fact, Chevy must over deliver -- and under promise.

Posted by Michelle Krebs at 5:11 AM under Analysis , Commentary , Featured , GM | Comments (11) | digg this | Seed Newsvine

11 Comments

It had better be improved. I just rented an '07 Malibu for three days, and found it utterly uninspiring. Terrible, overboosted steering...hard plastics...just the most boring transportation appliance you could imagine.
I realize it's not meant to be a sporting machine, but somehow I bet Chevy will still fall short with the '08. I hope I'm wrong.

Posted by: Ray | August 24, 2007 at 5:56 AM

It will have to be better than the Aura. It will take more than being "competitive" to move satisfied customers out of vehicles they like and trust.
It will have to be superior or you will see an indifferent response from the public.

Reality checks for GM:
Great job on the Impala? Take out the 54% fleet sales and it is way off pace. Take out the employee discount buyers and it is nowhere.

Reliablilty-GM has improved, it has some good scoring models but these are offset by some wretched ones and a sea of mediocre ones. The guys gaining market share have model lines that start at good and go up from there. The new 'Bu will need to be excellent. No excuses.

Design-Repeat comments for reliablity.

Recovery will take more than a few gems. They are against competitors that deliver a high level of competence and reliability as a matter of course, not as bright spots in there line.
Trust has been broken with the public and been earned by their competitors. "Competitve" does not give a person a reason to change seats. Excellence is needed.
IMHO

Posted by: Dennis | August 24, 2007 at 9:40 AM

Dennis hits on what should be the biggest point here: reliability. "Joe Average" has become more and more savvy over the years (though the Cobalt sales figures may say otherwise) as to long-term vehicle reliability. That's a big reason Camry and Accord are always tops, you know you're not going to find yourself stuck on the highway in either car.

I've never once owned a GM vehicle in my (admittedly short) lifetime, entirely due to their typical shoddy reliability. Of course, there are a few models that fare well (the Toyota-built Prizm and Vibe come to mind) but by and large GM cars can't be counted on.

GM has improved in recent times from "abysmal" to "mediocre"...now let's see them take the next step to "dependable".

Posted by: Brad | August 24, 2007 at 2:02 PM

Chevrolet needs to remake its image from the ground up. As soon as GM slaps that gold colored Chevrolet emblem on a car, it cheapens its image. It's tarnished -- the current gold colored emblem has become a sign of GM's incompetence. Change it to a more neutral color -- silver, and change the emblem to something like what Chevrolet uses in South America.

Posted by: Larry | August 24, 2007 at 2:46 PM

Here in Canada, Chevrolet sells a car called the Aveo, don't know if it's sold in the U.S. or not. Anyways, This new Malibu bears a striking resemblance to it. I believe it may be made by Suzuki. Can anyone shed some light on this? Other than the new front end, I would swear this is an Aveo.

Posted by: james | August 24, 2007 at 5:24 PM

How can it be any better than Aura? The dimensions are all but identical, the powertrains are similar as well.

Likely, Consumer Reports will buy a couple and declare it no better than Aura, which it hasn't rated spectacularly, about 17 points below the market leaders on their 100 point scale.

Game over, back to the fleets.

Posted by: xyzzy | August 26, 2007 at 9:00 AM

Somebody mention that Consumers Report will declare the Malibu no better than the Aura.I agree they will do that, no matter how good 2008 Malibu is. If you were in the auto business like I am, you would agree that you could not a more bias magazine than CR.

Posted by: Jack | August 26, 2007 at 9:29 AM

Brad: Factor in the approx. 40% of the Cobalts that are fleet (if memory serves) and the sales mystery goes away. Figure another piece going to employee/family discounts and I think we see the public giving that car the cold shoulder it deserves.

Jack: You may want to look at a recent issue of the engineering mag "Design News". They did an article on CR's testing. They interview engineers at the Detroit automakers and found that they regarded CR as the best testers in the buisness (2 of their engineers are ex-GM, BTW) and actually go to CR to learn from them how to make better cars.
You may also want to look at some recent issues, I believe one of GM's new crossovers finished first in a recent test. If they are biased against GM how did that happen.

In the interest of assessing bias, does your involvement in the industry happen to be linked with any particular brand? Just asking.

Maybe they just call them like they see them.

I think GM "plays for the bronze", and doesn't realize that just to get on the podium you need to play for the gold.
They are still trying to do "just enough" to "get the job done", while there competitors are shooting for excellence. It's a recipe on how to get your...you get the picture.

Cheerio.

Posted by: Dennis | August 27, 2007 at 1:22 PM

looking forward to the Malibu

Posted by: Chevrolet truck blog | September 05, 2007 at 10:23 PM

looking forward to the Malibu

Posted by: Chevrolet truck blog | September 05, 2007 at 10:24 PM

The imports don't sell to fleets or offer discounts ?? The import dealers I am familiar with have just as many mechanics and as large service bays as the domestics. It appears the imports have managed to win the PR contest with a segment of the American public only to ready to believe the worst about American companys.

Posted by: Chuck | November 01, 2007 at 1:59 PM

Leave a comment



AutoObserver RSS Feed

About Michelle Krebs

Michelle Krebs Michelle Krebs, veteran automotive-industry authority, joins Edmunds editors, analysts and data experts to provide news and commentary.
(Full bio)

Michelle on Inside Line

Michelle on CarSpace

Email Michelle

Categories

Archives

© 2008 Edmunds Inc.
Edmunds Automotive Network | Privacy Statement | Visitor Agreement