GM’s Volt: More Stretch Than Toyota’s Plug-In Hybrid, Bloomberg Reports
August 03, 2007
Kudos to Bloomberg News for reporting what many of us covering the auto
industry noticed but hadn’t written -– and shame on us for not doing so: Toyota's recently announced plug-in hybrid
has far less range than does General Motors’ Chevrolet Volt
concept -– as little as half the range, in fact.
GM intends for the Volt to travel at least 40 miles after being charged; Toyotaâs model may go no more than 20 miles on a single charge and possibly as little as 10 miles, Bloomberg reports, quoting sources familiar with the vehicles.
Interestingly, Bloomberg also quotes an unlikely source of praise for GM: Chris Paine, whose 2006 documentary, Who Killed the Electric Car? criticized GMâs decision to drop and destroy the EV-1.
Paine, who attended GM’s unveiling of the Volt at the January Detroit auto show, told Bloomberg electric vehicle fans are frustrated with GM for killing the EV-1 but also with Toyota for not having a plug-in Prius by now.
"The market is going to sort out which one is best,'' Paine said in an interview with Bloomberg. "GM is taking a bigger risk, and I applaud them for that.''
Who's Best?
Indeed, a glance at the specifications for each vehicle confirms the Volt outdoes the Toyota in range.
The Volt uses a battery that is planned for a range of 40 city miles on a single charge -- the average daily commute for a large share of Americans. After that, a small engine kicks in, not to power the car, but to generate electricity to power the wheels and extend the range of the vehicle to 640 miles. GM envisions the E-Flex system used in the Volt could have an engine that runs on a variety of fuels, including gasoline, diesel, ethanol, biofuels or hydrogen fuel cells.
Similar in concept, Toyota’s plug-in, based on the specifications it would have according to the automaker’s July announcement, would have half the electric-only range, and maybe less. However, Bloomberg quoted Jaycie Chitwood, a U.S. senior strategic planner with Toyota's advanced vehicle group in Torrance, California, who said a plug-in Prius for the consumer market would probably go farther. Yet, she declined to provide Toyota's target range.
A key for both companies will be batteries. GM is counting on advanced lithium-ion batteries for the Volt and its derivatives. It has awarded development contracts to battery makers. Toyota also is working on lithium-ion batteries but has said they will not, as had been expected, be in the next-generation Prius nor will it be in the current vision for a plug-in hybrid. Toyota, it has been reported, is nervous about the quality of lithium-ion batteries in the face of recent quality problems.
Who's First?
And then there’s the race for who will have the first plug-in hybrid on the road.
Toyota said in July it is testing its plug-in hybrids on public roads in Japan, Europe and the U.S. Sale to consumers is unknown.
Bloomberg, quoting unnamed sources, reports GM aims to have a prototype in early 2008 that can travel about 10 miles without recharging. The 40-mile Volt would follow in 2009 and might go on sale by the end of the decade.
The battle between Toyota and GM for the first and best plug-in hybrids is like the race to the moon between the U.S. and Russia in the 1960s. And the stakes are high for both companies: Toyota’s reputation as the world leader in hybrids is on the line, while GM's future as a technology leader, not a laggard, is in play.
Posted by Michelle Krebs at 7:41 AM under Commentary , Featured , GM , Personalities , Technology , Toyota | Comments (6) | digg this | Seed Newsvine


You need to take into account the difference in corporate mind set on this. Toyota is stating what it can do, and GM is stating what it thinks it can do. I have worked for a Japanese company in the past and they will always be conservative on specs and will never tell you yes untill they have studied the answer to death. American companies have inovation on their side but they have the tendency to overstate what they can do. So it seems like the phrase "a bird in the hand, is worth two in the bush" holds true, with the going rate being about 20 miles as the bird flies. I cant wait to see both of these come to market.
Posted by: mark | August 03, 2007 at 3:22 PM
Noticed the 40 miles city comment. I thought earlier statements indicated 40 highway speed miles, not city speed miles. Are the specs changing?
Posted by: LyleL | August 03, 2007 at 6:52 PM
For the life of me I do not understand why G.M. can't just bring back the EV-1 and make it available to every state. I would guarente that G.M. would be the biggest selling car in the United States. I don't know why a company as large as yours can't stand up to the big Oil Companies and give everyone in America the Choice to also to show them we are tired of being robbed every time we have to go to work. Pleaser be the ones to stick it to them for a change and be the Savior of the whole World at the same time.
Posted by: Charles F Ormerod | August 03, 2007 at 9:55 PM
The laments to bring back the EV-1 always intrigue me. The thing didn't sell the first time around; that's the main reason GM ditched it. It took 8 hours to re-charge. And who wants a two-seater? Honda got rid of the Insight for that very reason. The Volt and the family of vehicles that promise to spring from it are a far better solution -- one GM absolutely must be first and best with if it is to survive.
Posted by: Michelle Krebs | August 04, 2007 at 4:17 AM
I have to second Mark's comments.
It seems utterly pointless to draw a comparison between an actual running vehicle and the "promised" performance of a concept that is still waiting for some of it's essential technology to be developed.
It's easy to talk big. I will be impressed when and if GM actually delivers industry leading performance with top flite reliablility.
Posted by: Dennis | August 06, 2007 at 9:37 AM
I am quite humbled for having owned the 1st generation Prius for a few years now. It has required more care and feeding than I predicted, but that is the price for being on the bleeding edge. Here's what I've found: the car's batteries freeze solid in the Reno winter and require substantial time to thaw before driving. And in the hottest weather, the failure of the hybrid cooling system results in a $5,000 repair bill for a new inverter unit. With that said, I would like to make the point that hybrids are relatively delicate when compared to their gasoline & diesel powered bretheren, and THAT should be the main focus of all hybrid manufacturers - to close the reliability & support costs between these two technologies so that the total cost of ownership is predictably at or below the price of these non-hybrid vehicles. Toyota - are you listening?
Posted by: Russ | August 09, 2007 at 10:20 AM