Unabashedly American Design
By Michelle Krebs January 13, 2008Now that Toyota has become the second-largest selling carmaker in the U.S., it appears that the Japanese brand is on the way to becoming the worldâs largest automobile manufacturer, surpassing General Motors. In every competition, there are winners and losers, and in this case, slow and steady looks set to win the race.
Toyotaâs decades-long pursuit of QDR (quality, durability, and reliability), plus consistent brand building has made the company the darling of business schools as well as consumers. Yet the good news for Detroit is that there is another round to this race, and even the best of companies has an Achilles heel.
And with the 2008 Detroit auto show on the horizon this week, itâs a good time to talk about it. Because it all has to do with design.
Emotional Design
It is easy to name the most beautiful cars in the world. But where are the Japanese cars? When is the last time a Toyota made your heart skip a beat, and not just because the odometer turned to 300,000 miles?
Cadillac asks, âWhen you turn your car on, does it return the favor?â Only American car companies are so willing to ask this essential question.
Herein is Detroitâs competitive advantage against inroads by competitive brands from Europe, Japan, Korea and even China.
Coming to America
As we walked the floor of the Los Angeles auto show last November, we cornered car designers and executives from different cultures than our own and asked for a definition of the unique design character that defines American products, from cars to architecture.
Peter Horbury, the British-born Executive Director of Design, North America for Ford Motor Company says, âDesign is a direct reflection of the culture and society, and America is the most optimistic place on earth. People came here to succeed, and so there is a strong sense of bravado and openness to the designs.â
Ian Callum, Jaguar Cars Ltd.âs Scottish-born Director of Design, admits that heâs a fan of American car design, and he owns a â32 Ford hot rod and a custom â55 Chevy to prove it. He says, âEverything is just slightly exaggerated in America and I think itâs down to the geography of the country. I know that is something of a cliché, but I really think it is very, very true. Everything is slightly bigger and bolder, especially American cars.
âAnd what Iâve learned about American products, especially cars, is that thereâs to be that kind of turn up in visual volume that you donât get in European cars, where everything is tighter and more restricted. I donât want to use the words âbrashâ and âvulgarâ about American car design because itâs more subtle than that. American cars just have to shout a little bit louder.â
Itâs All About Space and Confidence
Fredrik Arp, the Swedish-born President and CEO of Volvo Car Corporation, also
sees something unique in the American aesthetic. âAmerican design reflects the wide-open spaces,â says Arp. âI've always appreciated in the U.S. that there are a lot of good materials, a lot of thought concerning functionality. There's a lot of good thought into infrastructure and how you build and how you develop things, because there seems to be space to do it.â
The availability of space makes the difference, Arp continues, âIn engineering and in construction, American design is often a bit oversized compared to what we are used to in Europe. So design has to do a little bit about what you want to show and how you want to be perceived. And I think there's a little bit of that in America -- that big is beautifulâ.
Shiro Nakamura, Osaka-born Senior Vice President of Design, Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., also believes that American aesthetic is about unbridled optimism and confidence. âThe post-war introduction of fins and fender flares may be the best known expression of American confidence,â explains Nakamura, who graduated from Art Center College of Design in California. He notes that this sense of optimism is lacking in todayâs domestic cars, yet continues, âBut the spirit is still very strong in Americaâs culture, and it is bound to resurfaceâ.
But Where Did the Confidence Go?
If confidence is a key to American car design, where did it go?
Franz von Holzhausen, Design Director, Mazda, an American who spent many
years in Volkswagen's German studio, says, âBack after the Great Depression, there was a real emphasis on consumerism to get the country going again, so the message was buy, buy, buy. Then in the Jimmy Carter presidency, all that stopped and suddenly there was no design left. Look at the time when he was president and look at the design language that American cars had. There was nothing. You donât recall any mid-Seventies cars as an icon, and American cars lost their confidence.â
Ian Callum believes that American designers went too far during the 1980s and 1990s in rejecting their heritage of the Harley Earl days of the 1950s when consumer confidence was soaring. âThat confidence leaked away because designers wanted to be multi-national Europeans,â he says. âBecause European cars were exotic and unattainable, they wanted to do their own European-style cars.â
Callum further notes that the trend to think of car design and product design hasnât been necessarily a good thing. He says, âI think good product design is recognized worldwide, so itâs very international. When it comes to cars, cars are about character, and thatâs what makes cars different from a product.â
But Von Holzhausen think things are changing. He says, âAs Americans, weâre finding our way in design, and weâll always be finding our way. But weâre a little bit more about flash and panache than the rest of the markets, except for maybe China.â
Unabashedly American Design
Sometimes it takes an outsider looking in to see what is invisible to the insiders. The worldâs top car designers and executives clearly see the optimism and confidence inherent in American designs. American design is slightly oversized with a slightly exaggerated expression, and thereâs no reason to be embarrassed about it.
American carmakers seem to be rediscovering this unabashedly American car aesthetic. Susan Docherty, General Motorsâ Western Region General Manager and formerly one of the principal architects of GMâs Hummer brand -- certainly an archetypal American style -- says that today GM is about, ââ¦pride in our vehicles and something that we don't have to apologize for.â
She also notes that Bob Lutz, GMâs Vice Chairman, consistently tells GM designers, âI don't care how great your interior is, if I can't get you to stop in your tracks on the [exterior] design part of this, then we haven't done our job.â
Tell the Story
This is the message of confidence that might counter the decline in consumer optimism in the economy. And it is a message that can integrate the desire Americans have for a bold expression with their emerging appreciation for improved function and a desire for environmental responsibility.
As Fordâs Peter Horbury, who will be showing off new Lincoln designs at the Detroit show, says, âAmericans need functionality. They still use trucks for hauling and trailers for towing, and unless horses get smaller, [new vehicles] are not going to be just downsizing, but more about new materials and innovations in efficiency.â
If itâs true that design tells a story, then American design needs to tell the story of America. Being able to express an unabashedly American design aesthetic is at the heart of the competitive advantage of American carmakers.
And in the end, they should never forget that buying a car in America is one part need to two parts desire.
Jane Nakagawa is a California-based correspondent for AutoObserver covering design topics. She formerly worked for Nissan North America.

LEAVE A COMMENT
Click here to comment on this entry.American cars don't receive kudos like the Japanese cars when it comes to longevity. In my area, I see plenty of '60s and '70s era American cars that continue to share the roads and look good. I am a GM fan because most of our GM cars has lasted for more than 10 years. My father bought a '79 Chevy Impala brand new and passed the car down to me when I went to college. We had the car for 17 years and over 226,000 miles with no major problems until it was stolen and never recovered. We have a '88 Chevy Caprice that now has over 261,000 miles and has never been in the shop for any major repairs. Our '93 Chevy S-10 is now 14 years old, has 178,000 miles, and still running well. Even my 8-year-old Olds Alero has 143,000 miles and still running well. Now I also have a 07 Saturn Aura that I expect to have for at least 10 or more years.
So nobody can tell me that the Japanese cars has a lock on longevity and quality. Most times it depends on the owner and how the owner treats their cars.
Good article.
To me, most of the issue lies in the fact that American car companies really never emphasized the car as an appliance (they did with pickups - to great effect). Has America really ever had their heart into the design of mid-size and compact cars? I say, other than the Ford Taurus of the mid-80s, no.
The reality is many customers buy cars to get from 'A' to 'B' in the compact and mid-size market. They want efficiency and durability. Definitely not American car company strengths. That was the deciding factor for people, not how pretty and emotive it was.
The Civic , for example, isn't particularly pretty. In fact, it's cab-forward ala the original Chrysler design ethos. The Honda, however, is relentlessly effective in transporting people efficiently with longevity. To car buyers in that category, that's prettier than extroverted exterior design.
I get a little frustrated with the exterior design execution of most cars. Where/why is there a disconnect from the styling groups and the production engineering folks? For example, last year's Lincoln MKR concept to me was a knockout. A MOTORCAR that was showfloor ready if you would just replace the all glass roof and 400hp engine with something more conventional. A car you could sell at $50,000 full MSRP all year long. I bet there are some Lincoln Dealer principals and sales people out there wondering the same thing; why the MK-S? We are ready for gorgeous cars again. If we are going to have 35mpg fleet average than put a 4 cylinder in a style that is exiting rather than just inoffensive.
These people are so far above the average income earners they can't even tolerate eating anything but caviar and red wine.
Come on,....we want cars that get 50 miles to the gallon, and cost less than the clothes that these people are wearing in the "pretty advertisements" above. No more studies are needed, no more Power Lunches, no more 5 liter engines. Let's face the music, not revel in what once was.
All the Best,
FB
Jane, I'm sure that you reported accurately what the people you spoke with said. Whether they believe what they said is an open question.
"Detroit" has to go with what it has, at least in the short run. It isn't obvious that "Detroit" builds cars that cost as little to own (purchase price, operating costs, maintenance expense, depreciation) as similar cars from, say, Toyota and Honda. All that Detroit has is flash, and I suppose that admitting otherwise would be suicidal for an employee of the former big three. But that doesn't mean that flash will save Detroit. It hasn't so far.
I'm going to stick with Honda and not gamble that GM has stopped lying. GM, Ford, and especially Chrysler have a long history of failure to deliver value to live down. Puff pieces written by automotive journalists won't convince me that "Detroit" has reformed. A good decade of delivering solid value might, but I'm not sure that GM, Ford and especially Chrysler have a decade left.
I was interested to see the common perspectives on American design from such a diverse group of designers. It would be interesting to see if they have a common view of Aision and European design and how the different design directions appeal to different cultures.
I feel that some of the above comments miss the point of the article. Yes Toyota and Honda make cars we can trust, but will that be enough in the future. GM and Ford are improving their basic quality, and at some point will consistantly make products with competitive quality. By that time, the Japanese will have to figure out what type of emotional response their designs will need to generate in order to stay ahead of Detroit.
Shouldn't we all get more than just great QDR for our $30K?
ADD A COMMENT