Think City, the Electric Car that Could Change Everything
April 03, 2008
MONACO -- Jan-Olaf Willums, CEO of Think Global and the driving force behind the company’s new electric car, looked like his own batteries were nearly flat by the time AutoObserver sat down to chat with him at the EVER Monaco ecological car show. Held March 27-30, EVER Monaco is an annual exhibition of alternatively powered vehicles and energy systems. After a full day of interviews and roundtable discussions, Willums’ eyes looked weary, his tie was undone, and he bravely tried to stifle a yawn as we began the interview.
Five minutes into our conversation, the fog had lifted and Willums had hit his stride. His eyes were sharp, and the professorial-looking automotive CEO made it clear Think will not be content to simply reignite interest in electric vehicles. Think wants to revolutionize how customers buy a car, how they consume energy and even how they interact with their vehicle.
The Think City’s long road to realization
Behind Willums sat Think’s latest creation, and the car the Norwegian company hopes will take it to the U.S. market by 2009. Introduced a month earlier during the Geneva Motor Show, the Think City is short and boxy, with doe-eyed headlights and a nifty glass hatchback. The City has a top speed of around 65 miles per hour, a range of more than 120 miles in city driving, and a full complement of safety features such as ABS and airbags. The cabin is comfortable, well-built and handsome.
Think promises that up to 95 percent of the City is recyclable. Even the body panels are color-impregnated plastic. This makes them tough and dent resistant, and also eliminates the toxins that are released during the painting process. Of course, the secret to the potential success of the Think City will not rest solely upon cute looks and recyclability — though they certainly won’t hurt its chances.
Think Global can trace its roots back almost two decades. Founded in 1991, the upstart electric car company was originally known as Pivco. Based in Oslo, Norway, the company’s early electric vehicles were unrefined and fairly ugly. Yet they were updated and improved to the point that they caught the eye of none other than Ford Motor Company. Seeking to counter General Motors' highly publicized EV1 electric car, Ford purchased Pivco in 1999.
Ford pumped tens of millions of dollars into what it curiously renamed the “Th!nk city” car. The bizarre spelling still crops up today, though most company literature now sticks with the simpler (and spell-check friendly) “Think.” No matter the name, Ford’s purchase of Think was disastrously timed. California’s electric-vehicle mandate was first watered down to include hybrid vehicles, then quashed completely in 2003 under continuous threat of legal action by major auto manufacturers such as DaimlerChrysler and General Motors.
Escalating financial woes — not to mention the PR nightmare brought on by the Ford Explorer and Firestone tires rollover debacle — meant Ford could not justify investing in a left-field project like a Norwegian electric-car manufacturer. Ford sold Think in 2003, and for several years the company remained in a wilderness of nearly completed projects and nonexistent business plans.
Recharging the Think brand
Willums maintained Ford’s sale of Think was not due to the electric-car company’s lack of potential. “There was always a very dedicated following amongst Ford for Think,” he said. He emphasized Think still has a “good relationship” with the American car company and many parts on the Think City, such as the steering wheel, are still sourced from Ford. For all you fans of automotive trivia: Think’s taillights are identical to those once used in the Lamborghini Diablo supercar.
Willums bought Think for a paltry $15 million two years ago. “I called two colleagues who had started a very successful multibillion-dollar solar company,” he said of the initial investment. Development has moved quickly because, as Willums readily admitted, much of the groundwork had already been done. “We had a 90 percent finished car and a good factory."
Early last year additional funds totaling approximately $93 million were raised for development. Investors include Dean Kamen, inventor of the Segway scooter. Google co-founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, are also big fans and invited Think to a brainstorming session in July.
Even German sports car specialist Porsche has played a role in Think’s rejuvenation. Porsche engineers were hired to visit Think’s factory in Aurskog, Norway, and offer suggestions for improvement. Willums said Porsche helped Think streamline production and increase the factory’s annual capacity from 7,000 to 10,000 units. But these hard numbers are only part of Think’s future sales strategy.
The company plans to sell its cars almost entirely via the Internet. Customers will buy the car, but lease the batteries in a system Think refers to as its “Mobility Pack.” Willums said the mobility-pack fee would be $100 to $200 per month (depending on the market) and would include the batteries, car insurance, carbon offsets and even Web service. An owner could text message his/her car and receive messages back with service updates and diagnostics. The batteries would be replaced and recycled when the vehicle detects they’ve lost their optimum efficiency levels.
On Sale in Europe, and On Its Way to the U.S.
The new Think City is already on sale in Norway. Sales in Sweden and Denmark will start “very soon,” said Willums. Orders are currently being taken in the UK, with sales expected to begin there in March 2009.
Willums said changes to government rules and regulations concerning electric vehicles have pushed some markets to the forefront. For example, France recently announced electric-vehicle tax rebates of around €5,000 (about $7,900). Willums said he now hopes for sales to begin in France by the end of this year.
Willums said the Think is sticking to its ambitious plan to sell the Think City in the U.S. by 2009. One obvious sticking point is the car’s high price. In the UK the Think will carry a sticker price of nearly $30,000. “We need to get the price down for the U.S.,” he said matter-of-factly. He defended the City’s price by saying it’s a “real car” manufactured to the same safety standards of any other vehicle. The mobility-pack system should also help keep costs in check.
As for possible low-cost competition from a super-cheap city-car such as the Tata Nano, Willums said he does not see the Indian-built hatchback as posing any real threat. “There is no way that the current Nano will ever come to Europe or America. It would require so much re-engineering.” But Willums didn't dismiss the Nano entirely. “It’s still a great car for India and other developing markets,” he said.
Willums said he believes a target price range for the U.S. would be $18,000 to $20,000. To make this possible, he said any Think City cars sold in America will also have to be built there. High manufacturing costs brought about by building the car in Norway — along with the weakening value of the dollar — make localized production a necessity for profitability. A search is on for a manufacturing site in the U.S.
Willums promised additional news relating to the American market will be coming very soon.•
Nick Kurczewski is a Paris-based correspondent working for AutoObserver.
Photo 1 — The Think City electric car, capable of around 65 mph, with a range of 120 miles in city driving.
Photo 2 — The Think City has been built to meet global safety requirements and has a level of refinement far beyond those of most electric cars, as evidenced by its well-thought-out interior.
Posted by Michelle Krebs at 4:06 AM under Business , Companies , Ford , Technology | Comments (13) | digg this | Seed Newsvine



An interesting concept and the range sounds good for an electric, but the $100 - 200 rental fee, in addition to a relatively high price for the vehicle itself, may prove difficult to overcome.
Posted by: kurt | April 03, 2008 at 7:24 AM
Sure it can be built in the USA: ask Ford or GM to sell one of their car plants to Think. The real issue with electric cars is this: Can it survive a Detroit or Minneapolis winter and not completely stall out? Also, batteries are a REAL issue too: how is that being addressed? Battery longevity and lack of range and cost are what killed the EV1, not GM alleged stupidity.
Posted by: Isaac | April 03, 2008 at 4:57 PM
Thirty thousand dollars for a Th!nk in the UK is really not as high as it sounds to us. $30,000 is about 15,050 Pounds Sterling. According to Toyota's UK website, a British market Prius base price is 17,777 Pounds which is about $35,400. Here, according to Toyota's US website, a Prius starts at $21,100. So if Mr. Willums can get the Th!nk built here and keep the price point under $25,000, good value for an all-electric, I think, it would do well. The Mobility Pack leasing scheme is positively brilliant and addresses a comment I wrote March 28th on Kate Mc Leod's Blog post, "Turning to Turbo"-hybrid vs turbocharging.http://www.autoobserver.com/2008/03/turning-to-turb.html#comment-108595562
Posted by: fulcrumb | April 04, 2008 at 9:48 PM
Ford has a plant in Wixom, MI it shuttered this year. Lots of people looking for any job too.
And just think (pun intended) the new workers could drive Thinks! to work each day --
Posted by: Nancy | April 07, 2008 at 1:58 PM
Hey Isaac, do you know where Norway is? Arctic country, really cold Winters.
Posted by: Andrew | April 21, 2008 at 5:37 PM
One thing not mentioned is 0-60 time of the Think City.
I think it is around 16 seconds. You could get killed on highway accelerating that slow.
I think the Chevy Volt will be guaranteed to do 0-60 in less than 9 seconds, battery life of 10 years or 150,000 miles and price of around $30,000. I think its range is only 40 miles but it has a real engine to automatically recharge battery for another 400 mile range. Anyway, production of Think City for USA will not start until 2009, by that time the Chevy Volt should have just started to ramp up full production for the 2010 model Chevy Volt. The race is ON !.
BTW, GM has already said they are willing to take huge losses (i.e. $$ billions) in the first few years. This mean depending on the EV competition they will PRICE the Volt appropriately to sell them ALL, no matter what.
Posted by: Andy Petty | April 22, 2008 at 2:58 PM
Four(4) really exciting things about this vehicle:
1) No Emission Equipment - This typically adds $4,000 dollars to price of a vehicle
2) Internet Purchase Only - This eliminates all the "middle men" taking a cut of every new vehicle
3) Much less parts - Extremely low maintainence costs (this adds up rapidly after a few years of ownership)
4) New Battery = New Car - You can actually get a faster more efficient battery in later years that will make your used car perform "better" than new by just replacing old battery with newer hi-tech model.
Posted by: Andy Petty | April 22, 2008 at 3:07 PM
I'm intrigued by this car. I hope that, unlike some of the others that have turned out to be frauds (Tesla's roadster comes to mind), that this is real. It's got to meet safety standards, ride like a typical subcompact, meet its performance claims, and cost less than $20,000. If it does that, I think they'll really have something.
Posted by: Watching Closely | April 26, 2008 at 7:11 PM
The problem with GM's Volt isn't the concept, but GM. Has General Motors ever kept a promise?
Posted by: Watching Closely | April 26, 2008 at 7:13 PM
I JUST WANT TO KNOW WHEN, OR HOW CAN I BUY STOCK IN 'THINK' ON THE NEW THINK CITY ELECTRIC CAR
Posted by: JASON | April 28, 2008 at 9:42 PM
"Think City" has good hy-way speed and fair run time. Now we have to get charging meter parking spots at Malls, movies and food shopping. Once installed, I think we will buy. Mobility Pack leasing scheme is too costly at $200. a month. I don't spend that @ $3.70gal. for a month. Belgium it's over $8. a gal. so there it's worth it there. I live in Florida, try driving in the summer w/o AC!
Posted by: cummings, charles | May 05, 2008 at 7:24 AM
I'm intrigued, if electric cars will be famous then the auto parts will be electric and available on online shops like autopartswarehouse.com
Posted by: warpfreak | June 13, 2008 at 10:33 PM