The Best and Worst Ideas of 2009
December 28, 2009
Desperate times require desperate measures, as the saying goes, and 2009 was about as desperate as it gets in the auto industry.
Companies sometimes do the most interesting things when they're desperate -- and that maxim seems particularly relevant to auto companies. Because their products are so visible, with such potential emotional impact. Because their executives and designers and engineers are in charge of the process that creates those products.
Desperation in 2009 -- as defined by coming up some 6 million sales short of the industry's glory days of just three years ago -- generated products and strategies that ran the gamut from ridiculous to sublime. Some ideas were inspired; some were just tired.
Here are a few of the best and worst ideas from the auto industry in 2009:
2009's BEST IDEAS
Hyundai Assurance
Wow, who woulda thunk this gimmicky response (refreshingly light on gimmicks, actually) to the nation's epidemic employment anxiety would help cement Hyundai's rep for totally in-tune-with-the-times marketing?
There was about a 90-day window at the worst of the crisis when Hyundai Assurance completely resonated as a singularly effective marketing "reach out" to the few buyers shopping for a new car in the worst market in 40 years.
Cutting Capacity
Geez, there's a concept. Maybe we should only make about as many vehicles as we sell. Maybe there won't be as many left over that way. Maybe we won't have to cut the price so much, either.
Overcapacity was a decades-old problem nobody wanted to tackle. Shame the recession had to force everybody to deal with it, but now that it's happening, all those macroeconomic gurus don't look so silly and slowly, there's sense coming back to one of the industry's most basic viability-insuring equations.
Course workers who are victims of downsizing and capacity reductions certainly wouldn't put this on their "good idea" list.
Kissing Off Hummer
Bad idea when somebody in tassle loafers dreamed it up back in 1999. Only took GM a decade to figure out how "unsustainable" the Hummer thing really was.
So argue about Pontiac, Saturn, even Saab. But parting with Hummer (closing it down is at least as probable, given the wacky Chinese Connection deal GM threw together) is a decision that almost makes up for buying Hummer in the first place. Almost.
Hatchback Sedans
Ow, the Honda Accord Crosstour isn't exactly easy on the eyes, and there's not necessarily a lot of beauty in BMW's 550i GT, either -- but the new trend of hatchback sedans is encouraging.
First, because auto companies are taking chances. And because forging acceptance of hatches for the U.S. market is important. Hatches are practical, useful -- and often the better-looking body style if the proportions are right.
But hatches are the place we probably have to go if the vehicle fleet is to eventually be downsized to a point where serious fuel-efficiency can result. The Europeans are on board, dontcha know: hatchbacks like the Volkswagen Golf have been the Continent's "crossovers" for years -- with gas at $8 a gallon, Europeans simply don't expect the ability to bring the household sinks on every grocery-store run.
But for the job converting the masses, it'd be better if Americans were first presented hatchbacks of the Audi A5 Sportback ilk rather than the 550i GT.
Talking up the Volt
The Chevrolet Volt extended-range electric vehicle is pretty sweet science and its development one of GM's few industry-leading, big-picture technology efforts in a long while (maybe since the EV-1 electric vehicle).
The Volt is impressive, progressive and potentially game-changing. Yeah, GM's gone a little overboard with the promotion, but GM is right to hype the Volt.
Paperless Owners Manuals
Chrysler decided now is the time to stop printing owners manuals. Starting with '10 models, searchable DVDs will replace 900-plus tons of the ignored paper Chrysler plops in glove compartments every year.
Printed summaries will still be in the car and Lee Iacocca-vintage diehards can still request the full-blown printed manual.
Sticking With Opel
Somebody saw the light and realized that without Opel, GM was going to be relegated to being little more than a North American automaker that happens to be a solid player in China. European operations and development capability were essential to GM continuing as a competitive global automaker -- and some wags had suggested that from the beginning.
Hanging onto Opel at the11th hour didn't win many friends in Europe, but it was the right decision. A decision that said plenty about the intestinal fortitude (did we just use that phrase?) of GM's new board of directors.
Firing Rick Wagoner
Firing GM CEO Rick Wagoner last spring needed to be done.
Only in the corporate world do you preside over that kind of institutional decline and still have people question your dismissal.
Firing Fritz Henderson
Fritz Henderson may have had more on the ball than he was given credit for, but there was too much "old GM" in the crease of that fella's trousers. Like Wagoner, he'll probably thank somebody someday.
The Ford Fusion
Case study in how to take some pretty old bones and keep them going on the cheap. Ford has spent money wisely -- and accurately -- to make the Fusion a better car than it was when it was first launched for the 2006 model year.
On the strength of its bar-raising hybrid version, the Fusion won Motor Trend's Car of the Year award for 2010, a rare feat for a car not totally new, and it is a finalist for the North American Car of the Year award as well.
Buyers were snapping up the Fusion at a healthy pace -- 161,819 through November -- and it was likely to finish as one of the year's 10 best-selling models, leaving us to wonder whether the Fusion's reinvigorated appeal is attributable to engineers' effective fettling or to the fact buyers are identifying the Fusion as more "right sized" than the ballooning Japanese competitors.
2009's Mixed Bag
Cash for Clunkers
No matter where you stand on the politics of this controversial initiative, Cash for Clunkers did stimulate activity in dangerously deserted showrooms across the nation. The program also chopped down inventories and yep, even got people spending, spreading around some money on Main Street America.
Call it a $3-billion backdoor grant to automakers and dealers, but as a way to induce spending and temporarily prop up a vital industry, Cash for Clunkers may prove to be among the best stimulus money the government spent for consumers who took advantage of it and automakers who benefitted, even if timing and execution could have been better.
Double B's for GM, Chrysler
It was bailout and bankruptcy for GM and Chrysler, and between these two irksome gambits, lenders got skunked for sure and probably America's taxpayers, too.
But for the nation, it was like the fox that has to chew off its leg to escape the trap, particularly in the case of GM. The end justifies the means, distasteful though it might be. Glen Beck and Sean Hannity got enough socialist-finger-pointing ammunition to sustain them well into the next decade -- and maybe they've got an argument. Yet at the juncture the weak economy was, the bailout for GM and the U.S. was necessary. That's the way it had to go down.
Entering China Early
Eyebrows raised when years ago GM charged into China to sell old Buicks. Eventually others followed. And it was 2009 that the early pioneers got their payoff. Car sales in China surpassed those in the U.S. and everywhere else, generating desperately needed profits that kept many global automakers afloat during the recession.
2009's WORST IDEAS
The Dealer Dump
Chrysler and GM, hell-bent on proving to the Obama administration they were serious about restructuring and downsizing, set a course to save a lot of money by jettisoning vast portions of their national dealer networks.
From the start, the rationale and details behind the strategy looked as hastily concocted as a seventh-grader's book report written on the bus the morning it's due. Analysts wondered how either company could keep sales and market share, dealers were outraged and even politicos calling for the companies' figurative heads got involved when they realized the potential impact on their constituencies.
Were GM and Chrysler overdealered? Yes. Was this heavyhanded gambit the fix? Nope.
I Am Ram
This is Chrysler's front-line ad campaign for its vital Ram pickup line. And to paraphrase from its signature statement, the Ram's tank may be full, but the minds behind these putrid ads are running on fumes.
Panning advertising is always easy, but the I Am Ram effort is monumentally off-key. Or at least equal to the year's other testimony to Detroit's continuing talent for commissioning awful ad work, Buick's "Look At Me Now."
Chrysler: We're Making Money. No, Really!
In early November, Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne figured he had no choice but to lay out a grand five-year strategy plan for Chrysler's turnaround. The company's post-bankruptcy silence was deafening and they had to make it look like they were doing something besides smoking cigars and noshing salamis. Good enough.
But not satisfied to rest just on the utter incredulity of the plan itself, Marchionne opened the confab by laying it on pretty thick about what wonderful shape the company found itself in. Marchionne said Chrysler was revenue-positive in the third quarter and had added 1 billion to its cash on hand.
All true, perhaps -- but Marchionne supplied no context, of course. His assertions probably were accurate, but he didn't understand if-only-we-could-let-you-see-the-ledgers bragging about Chrysler's wonderful state of financial health was the sport of, well, the last two Chrysler owners who came before him. You know, the two owners who swore Chrysler was in fantastic shape right up to the point when they foisted off the "operationally bankrupt" company on the next unsuspecting owner.
Buick: Look At Me Now
The Mad Men writers could work a half-season's worth of episodes detailing how ad-agency sharpies fleeced the loping Midwestern Buick marketers with this obnoxious little campaign.
They spent money on this kind of cringe-inducing "creative," and we still wonder why GM went Chap 11?
Giving Up On Diesels
We thought automakers were getting religion on fuel economy. They've been telling us for the past couple of years they're going to invest in just that attribute "because customers want it" and are going to continue to want it.
Fine words when the industry's selling 16 million vehicles and people are paying 50 grand for fullsize 'utes. But the second sales dried up and what buyers were out there were no longer inclined to drop sloppy money on the conventional profit-machines, the "investment" automakers promised to make in fuel economy went up in smoke.
Lickety-split, a raft of ready-to-go plans for diesel-powered light vehicles were shelved. Diesels cost too much, companies from Ford to Honda to Nissan bleated. Don't ask us how anybody plans to get their fleets to the fed-mandated 35 miles per gallon by 2016 when CR-Vs struggle to get 25.
Newsflash here: 180-horsepower gasoline 4-bangers in near-lux cars or midsize crossovers isn't gonna be the solution.
Private Jets To Bailout Hearings
Those CEO party animals from Detroit came up a little short on self-awareness when they flew their private jets to bend over for Congress at the bailout hearings.
GM lost almost $70 billion in total between 2007 and 2009, so "austerity" clearly wasn't in the corporate lexicon. And by the time of this colossal public-relations fiasco, Chrysler was being run by Bob Nardelli, so 'nuff said there, too.
But why did supposedly uber-tuned-in Ford CEO Alan Mulally join in the Gulfstream tango? Was he betraying his roots at Boeing, where it'd be fine with them if Americans flew to the post office, or was it because half of Ford's executive ranks was winging outta Detroit on corp jets every weekend to get to where they really live?
Foot-Dragging On Floormats
Maybe it's not totally Toyota's fault, but the unintended-acceleration via wedged floormats issue spun out of control and didn't need to. Toyota displayed a magnificent amount of corporate irregularity in dealing with the situation, cleaving another vivid gash in the company's formerly impregnable reputation.
GMC Lives
Why is the division that epitomizes the rampant, marketing-driven rebadging the led GM to the brink still hanging around?
GM says "profitability." We say, "Uh, right..."
GMC is a square peg still being pounded into a round hole.
Chrysler Bankruptcy
Either you believe the herd needs thinned or you don't.
If you do, Chrysler's the runt of the litter and no combination of bailouts and bankruptcies is going to change that.
Come on now: Somebody - anybody - could have been doing Jeep better over the past decade, and the minivan thing is over, so explain to us again exactly what's left to save at Chrysler with those billions in bailout dollars?
Chrysler's bankruptcy was like handing a Marlboro to a jonesing junkie and calling it the answer to the problem. Those Obama Task Force brains can't think this is going to work, can they?
The 230-MPG Volt
Overpromising on the Chevy Volt's fuel-efficiency capabilities seemed a strategy destined for ridicule and smacked of the bad old days of GM marketing-by-hocus-pocus mentality.
At the very worst, throwing the 230-mpg figure out there assures some degree of disappointment from a car that should have to work to earn a black mark in its file. GM found a way to give it one with this juvenile gambit.
Chevy Volt Dancers
No explanation necessary. See for yourself the Chevy Volt dancers at the Los Angeles auto show - it's like trying to look away from a car crash.
Whining About Executive Pay
GM Chairman Ed Whitacre is a genial enough guy, but he's emitting signals of lurking tone-deafness when whining about how government-mandated executive pay restrictions are hog- tying GM's ability to russle up a worthy CEO candidate.
Ed: GM took the taxpayers' money. Great heaping Escalade EXTs full of it. And GM needed every dime. So get over it.
Sorry if GM's the poster child for the nation's annoyance with this "issue," but here's a recap, Ed, in case the telegraph wires to Texas got cut: if a million bucks, give or take, isn't enough to recruit somebody with a brain, then maybe it's time for all of Corporate America hang up the spurs. Did decades' worth of ya-won-the-lottery exec pay packages get it done for GM up to now?
Internet and TV On Board
Oh, yes. This is vital. Nothing going wrong on the highways another couple of pay-to-play distractions can't fix.
Sounds like great news for airbag suppliers and insurance companies, though.
The Honda Insight
With the all-new Insight hybrid, Honda is building a case for those who say the company is losing its famed engineering edge.
The Insight is a horrid little car from top to bottom - so bad, even the hyper-miler crowd can't bring themselves to buy it. Prior to the Insight's March launch, Honda was doing its famous nudge-nudge, wink-wink, "we-know-we're-gonna-sell-more" act about the 90,000 Insights it planned to sell annually.
Instead, the Insight wheezed its way to a paltry 18,933 sales through November. Honda blames low gas prices (funny, cheap gas didn't impede an estimated 140,000 Prius transactions for the year), but there's only one real reason for such microscopic sales results: the Insight is epically crappy.
That doesn't bode well for the coming CR-Z hybrid coupe based on the Insight's mechanicals. If the youth-bait CR-Z ends up anywhere near as vile as the Insight, Honda's going to have some 'splainin' to do.
Porsche Is Assimilated
Look, we like Volkswagens. Usually lots of good and interesting stuff in there. But the company that uses its legion of econobox brands to knock out the majority of Europe's mainstream cars - good as they are - shouldn't have its fingers in Porsche's sauerkraut.
It's really all the result of some mediaeval Germanic revenge play because Porsche had the audacity to think it was going to take over VW. Mix in some serious familial powerbrokering and now you end up with Porsches inevitably sharing parts with Seats, never mind Audis. The apocalypse draws nigh... - Bill Visnic, Senior Contributing Editor
Michelle Krebs, Senior Analyst and Editor at Large, contributed to this post
Graphic by Lauren Migaki
Photos by Manufacturers except where noted
1 - Hyundai Assurance ad
2 - Chrysler closed its Delaware plant in 2009
3 - Car advertised under Cash for Clunkers plan
4 - Hummer H3T
5 - Audi A5 Sportback (photo by Edmunds.com)
6 - Chevrolet Volt
7 - Ousted GM CEOS Rick Wagoner (left) and Fritz Henderson
8 - 2010 Ford Fusion
9 - Closed dealership (iStock photo)
10 - Chrysler/Fiat's Sergio Marchionne
11 - Volkswagen Jetta TDI has gained in sales
12 - Toyota floormat (photo by Edmunds.com)
13 - Chevrolet Volt to achieve 230 mpg
14 - GM Chairman and now CEO Ed Whitacre
15 - 2010 Honda Insight unveiled
Posted by Michelle Krebs at 9:22 AM under Chrysler , Commentary , Companies , Featured , Ford , GM , Personalities , Technology | Comments (4) | digg this | Seed Newsvine


How are paperless owners manuals a good idea unless the car comes with a DVD player with a simple user interface? The first time you are traveling and have a flat tire, notice a cryptic warning light, or can't figure out how to operate your radio or navigation device, you will be very unhappy with Chrysler. Relatively speaking, Chrysler is a low-tech company that sells to low-tech buyers who prefer paper manuals. Mindless cost-cutting will drive those buyers away from the showrooms.
Posted by: pafromfl | December 29, 2009 at 6:18 AM
At pafromfl:
READ THIS LINK: http://tinyurl.com/yjzv62t
This was a big conversation in the blogs when they announced it months ago, and I'm still just floored at how many people just read headlines, become an expert immediately, grab their pitchforks, and head for the door without READING THE REST. They just see the words "DVD manual" and panic and stop reading/thinking immediately and start with the Chrysler-hate comments. But just as stated above, A PRINTED MANUAL STILL COMES WITH THE CAR and is actually a 60-80 page book that tells you exactly how to deal with emergency issues like you mentioned (flats, dead batteries, warning lights) and basic features (air conditioning, wipers, navigation systems, and roadside assistance). All that without even touching the DVD. That covers EVERY item you gave as an excuse. You don't lose a SINGLE thing with this condensed manual/DVD setup. You really think in todays market that removing basic automotive features like manuals would be acceptable for ANY brand? Handing over an advantage to a competitor for something as simple as a printed book? Or creating safety issues by leaving customers on the side of the road with incomplete documentation in a lawsuit-crazy world? Wake up! Customers today want more for less in what is already an ultra-competitive industry. Also, the DVD is playable/accessible in MANY of the in-car systems, but NOT all (you need the higher-end nav/dvd systems, low-end radios won't play it in-car). Still want a full 500 page manual? Fine, just fill out the form in the glovebox and you will receive your paper version if you MUST have one for some reason, and the big 'problem' is solved! If having it any way you want makes for a bad thing, I don't get it (and someone should tell Burger King that "have it your way" is a bad slogan for some reason).
IMHO this is LONG overdue for cars in general (sad a DVD manual is still considered 'high-tech' to anyone). The DVD with the abridged manual is an UPGRADE to the traditional book-only method, not a downgrade as some folks are implying. Confused on how to operate the convertible top? Watch the full-motion video tutorial of it's operation on your DVD screen in-car or on your computer at home! OR you can look it up in the 60-80 page condensed manual under basic operation. The old book-only method is obviously limited that way to just the drawings. So again, still nothing missing with this new setup whatsoever. It is NOT a DVD-only setup as a lot of people are hung up on after reading only the headlines, and I doubt it ever will be for ANY brand unless nav screens come standard in all models for that brand.
Bottom line is that if Toyota or Honda would've done this first, it would be heralded as a cutting edge tree-hugger feature, but heaven forbid an American company (especially Chrysler) do something first. I can't imagine others will not follow, but only AFTER Chrysler takes all the flak for them and the public gets caught up that nothing is missing. This is hardly mindless cost cutting as you suggest. It's a no brainer cutback really, why spend the money and waste trees for something no one uses except for a handful of times for the life of the car? Give them a cheap to make DVD that actually has MORE information than the big book on it, and also a small book with the essential info, all while saving some trees, how can you go wrong?
I'll tell you how: they made an assumption that the general public can read and understand a whole newsbrief and come away with the understanding that Chrysler customers can have it any way they want it. Those misinformed folks that love to talk trash will then go off with the half-truth and spew misinformation all around, so that not only the first person but everyone they speak with must be educated later on by someone else that DID read the whole article. But the damage is already done. Chrysler needs to make sure it's clear via commericals or something to nip this in the bud. It's a good feature to those that take the time to learn the facts, far more than JUST a cost cutting move!
Let's all put away the pitchfork and Chrysler-hate for a minute, step back and let's all wish our other "problems" were actually upgrades!
Posted by: vmx12 | December 30, 2009 at 9:13 AM
Nice Tirade; I'm going with, "no".
Anything less than the full manual is NOT an upgrade. They're just reducing the probability that someone will leaf through the manual of their new car while they're waiting, or sit down with it and give it a look through.
We're letting them off easy with not including the repair manual to start with.
Please don't sugar coat the "stupidification" of America.
This is the same thing as not offering manual transmissions in vehicles. It was a dumbass idea that the American car manufacturers started and Honda/Toyota is following suit on. It doesn't matter who came up with it, it's still a dumb idea.
Posted by: dstppy | December 30, 2009 at 11:00 AM
Diesels won't do well in this country until the price disparity between both diesel cars and diesel fuel-vs-gasoline cars and fuel come much closer than they are today.
In the US, fuel prices are market based; the higher the demand, the higher the price. Most people see diesel fuel at their favorite station typically runs 12 to 25 cents per gallon more than 87 octane regular gasoline and are all done with diesels at that point.
Those that make it to the next level, comparing vehicle prices at the dealer or online at http://www.edmunds.com/ are less than enthused about diesels when they discover that they cost $4-to nearly 6,000 more than the comparable gasoline model.
In most of Europe, fuel prices are artificially manipulated at the consumer level through tax policy. Fundamentally, a barrel of crude oil can yield more refined diesel fuel than refined gasoline. Thus the world wants a lotta diesel; higher demand higher refined price.
But by taxing gasoline and diesel at levels that bias consumer preference to diesels results in less oil consumption overall. Manufacturing costs of diesel engines can be amortized over a larger production base, and multiple brands available with diesels work toward keeping initial costs more in line. So European consumers drive a diesel that will cost less to own and operate [at the individual level] than their North American cousins.
Their may be some good arguments for owning a Diesel in the States, but saving money ain't one of them.
Posted by: fulcrumb | December 30, 2009 at 1:43 PM