Consumer Reports: Honda, Toyota Still Tops in Reliability; GM Improves
By Michelle Krebs October 26, 2010
Consumer Reports magazine revealed the results of its 2010 reliability survey Tuesday and here's the upshot:
- Toyota, despite numerous large recalls, and, to an even greater degree, Honda reign supreme in reliability.
- General Motors, which shed its debt in bankruptcy along with problem-plagued brands, showed vast improvement, especially with its newest models.
- Ford, on a continuous improvement path for the past half-dozen years, showed more incremental improvement.
- Hyundai and Kia is making "extraordinary" progress.
- Chrysler still trails everyone.
- European automakers fell off a cliff in reliability.
GM: Major Gains in Reliability
"The big news this year is how well GM has done," David Champion, senior director of Consumer Reports' Auto Test Center told the Automotive Press Association in Detroit in revealing the survey results of 1.3 million vehicle owners.
Of all GM vehicles, 69 percent now achieve average or better than average reliability, up from 43 percent a year ago. Cadillac improved the most, rising seven places from last year's rankings. Chevrolet, GM's volume leader, had 83 percent rated as average or better, up from 50 percent a year ago.
Champion noted that the newer models are doing the job for GM. The Buick LaCrosse had above average reliability in its first year. "It's easier to continue to be reliable if a vehicle starts out reliable."
The Chevrolet Equinox also fared well. Oddly, however, the nearly identical GMC Terrain did not, an oddity that Champion could not explain.
Champion said GM ditching Saturn, Pontiac and Hummer, brand with problem-plagued models, helped it overall. "But older vehicles are still holding GM back," he added.
Ford: More Continuous Improvement
Ford is the one domestic manufacturer that still dominates in terms of reliability, said Champion, noting the automaker has made incremental improvements year after year for the past half-dozen years. Of all Fords (and Lincolns) sold, 90 percent rate as average or above average reliability, outdoing Mazda and Nissan and putting Ford just below Lexus.
Ford's new vehicles are reliable "right out of the gate" putting Ford overall where Toyota is, Champion said.
The Ford Fusion Hybrid took the No. 1 spot for family cars. The Fusion is the most reliable midsize sedan again in 2010, more reliable than Honda Accord and Toyota Camry. In fact, the Honda Accord ranked just behind the Fusion, the Camry took a distant third with the Chevrolet Malibu immediately behind the Camry.
The Ford Flex, equipped with the EcoBoost, was first among large SUVs for reliability. The Ford F-150 was the most reliable domestic pickup truck. The Ford Mustang was above average.
Champion, however, seemed to caution that Ford could face reliability challenges with European developed vehicles like the new Ford Fiesta and the upcoming Ford Focus.
"Ford is doing well at the moment but we'll see what happens with the Euro-based vehicles," he said.
Chrysler: Trailing the Pack
"Chrysler hasn't really improved," said Champion. "It's product line is dated and is not very competitive."
More than half of Chrysler vehicles rate below average in reliability. The sole "bright spot" is the Ram 1500, the only Chrysler vehicle on Consumer Reports' recommended list.
However, Champion is optimistic. Having recently tested some of the new upcoming Chrysler models, "we're impressed with where they are going," he said. The revamped 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is "head and shoulders" above the one it replaces. And, Champion said, he senses a different mindset about quality and reliability at Chrysler, now run by Italy's Fiat following last year's Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
"We'll have to see how the new models do -- if their reliability matches the performance we've seen," he said.
Koreans Excel
"Hyundai and Kia have made extraordinary progress," Champion said. "Those manufactuers have made the most progress in the shortest time."
Particular standouts are: the Hyundai Sonata, "among the best family sedans," Kia Sorento and Kia Soul, which had average reliability in its first year.
Only the Kia Sedona minivan is the exception. "It has been problematic since its launch and has stayed that way," said Champion.
Honda, Toyota: Still Tops
All Honda models rate above average in reliability in Consumer Reports' survey, putting it at the top of the list.
Most Toyota models came out above average.
Nissan's mainstream models did well but the Nissan Cube was below average.
European Automakers Decline
"The Europeans are really struggling at the moment," said Champion.
He said BMW is having "enormous problems" with the fuel systems and fuel pumps on turbocharged models, including the BMW 1, 3 and 5 Series.
Likewise for Audi. "The A6 was good until they put in the supercharger. Now they are having problems with the engine management system and the check engine light coming on."
In addition, Audi's A3, Q5 and Q7 rate below average in reliability
Nearly half of all Mercedes-Benz models are below average.
At Volkswagen, the Golf and Jetta TDI "do okay," the Touareg is average but the Chrysler-Built Routan "is a bit of a nightmare," champion said.
Worst, however, is the Jaguar XF, which has the worst predicted reliability rating in this year's survey, Champion added.
In contrast, all Volvo and Porsche models are average or better with the C30 coupe being Volvo's most reliable car and the Porsche Boxster being the most reliable car in the Consumer Reports' survey.
Reliability: Improving and Matters
The reliability of all vehicles has improved dramatically in the past decade or so. Champion said when he joined the magazine in 1997, the average vehicle had 28 or 29 consumer complaints per 100 vehicles sold. Today, the average is 14 or 15.
Champion said that reliability plays a pivotal role in customer loyalty. The survey asks if the owner if they would buy the same vehicle again.
LEAVE A COMMENT
Click here to comment on this entry.It is interesting that Fiats have some of the lowest reliability ratings in Europe. How that helps Chrysler raise their game is hard to see.
While Fiat does score low in many European reliability surveys, Chrysler has other issues, such a driving dynamics, fuel economy, and interior feel, that the Italians should be able to help with.
why are these results treated as gospel when CR provides so little background on the data? So an "average" vehicle is one that generates 15 complaints per 100 vehicles sold which means that an "unreliable" chrysler could be one with 25 problems per 100 vehicles sold. CR's data is presented in a way to generate headlines- the reality is there is a small gap in reliability and we cant get a true picture until they open up the survey to non owners.
Yeah, you didn't mean to say it, but you did: non-owners (you meant non-subscribers I'm sure). Allowing just anyone to participate would allow all kinds of people who don't really own one to submit a survey to tilt the results towards their favored company. Also, for a vehicle to be considered worse than average, it must have at least 20% more complaints than average. Much worse starts at 40. While I do wish they'd release problem rates on a weighted basis for model years, 20% is still a significant difference (each way). Yes, it has problems, but there's nothing else even close to it.
Its still garbage. First of all they never tell you the minimum sample size. Some very low volume imports (FJ Cruiser, LX470, Porsche models, etc.) manage to get rated which makes you question how many responses are enough to warrant a rating. We also have no idea if their subscriber base represents the general public. This is why surveys sent to different owners each year are much more valuable if they show consistent results. CR's base is probably heavily skewed towards the brands they recommend. In addition, less than 50% of their subscribers even respond which makes you wonder if mostly the same people are responding year after year.
Much worse than average may start at 20% off average but "below average" would have a lower threshold and a vehicle isnt recommended if its less than average. The point is "average" is very reliable. CR doesnt provide any data on number of dealer visits or repair costs or days out of service. They cover so many things under the guise of "reliability" that many of the lower ranked vehicles probably don't have any significant mechanical issues.
1487: I thought you would be happy in GM's turnaround progress in terms of reliability.
It may help them sell more cars, but honestly why would anyone buy anything but Japanese if they read CR? No matter what CR says about GM or Ford or the Europeans they bottom line is you should buy Japanese if you want the most reliable car. Its the same message every year- "american brands show improvement, but the best cars are still made by Asian manufacturers". Its a crock, especially when you consider a huge # of "imports" are built in the US by Amerians using parts from American suppliers. There is no rational explanation for the supposedly huge variation in quality amongst mainstream brands. In additon, ever notice how there is never any reflection of major recalls in CR's data? Nissan is announcing a major recall for stalling cars and yet I bet if you check the reliability record of every model involved in CR you will find all of them with top notch reliability.
I keep on hearing and reading that Honda is always at the top of the raliability according to experts and costumers; Are they ignoring the fact that Honda has been producing cars with transmission problems sinc 1999 (13 years) and despite their ''efforst'' to correct them their transmission keep failing ($4000).
Don't believe me, look it up in the internet and you will see for yourself.
And we say Honda makes reliable cars? I'm a witness that they don't, it's just marketing.
I keep on hearing and reading that Honda is always at the top of the raliability according to experts and costumers; Are they ignoring the fact that Honda has been producing cars with transmission problems sinc 1999 (13 years) and despite their ''efforst'' to correct them their transmission keep failing ($4000).
Don't believe me, look it up in the internet and you will see for yourself.
And we say Honda makes reliable cars? I'm a witness that they don't, it's just marketing.
I keep on hearing and reading that Honda is always at the top of the raliability according to experts and costumers; Are they ignoring the fact that Honda has been producing cars with transmission problems sinc 1999 (13 years) and despite their ''efforst'' to correct them their transmission keep failing ($4000).
Don't believe me, look it up in the internet and you will see for yourself.
And we say Honda makes reliable cars? I'm a witness that they don't, it's just marketing.
I keep on hearing and reading that Honda is always at the top of the raliability according to experts and costumers; Are they ignoring the fact that Honda has been producing cars with transmission problems since 1999 (13 years) and despite their ''efforts'' to correct them their transmission keep failing ($4000).
Don't believe me, look it up in the internet and you will see for yourself.
And we say Honda makes reliable cars? I'm a witness that they don't, it's just marketing.
ADD A COMMENT