EPA Likely to Adapt Proposed New Fuel-Economy Window Stickers

By Bill Visnic October 15, 2010

At a public meeting this week in Chicage to take input regarding its intent to revise the fuel-economy labeling on new-vehicle window stickers, the Environmental Protection Agency said it's likely the look of the final product will differ from the early versions the agency unveiled earlier this year.

Label 1 EPA Fuel Economy label - 250.JPGAnd the dialogue continues regarding one particular aspect: whether the new fuel-economy label should include a letter "grade" from "A" to "D" to give consumers a simple, at-a-glance method for evaluating the fuel efficiency of a particular model under consideration. Although most automakers and other industry interests reportedly oppose this methodology for being too simplistic an approach, a representative for Hyundai Motor America Inc. said the company might support a letter-grade rating - but only with key modifications.

The EPA is under congressional mandate to revise the longstanding design and information of the fuel-economy labels, which are required to be on every new light vehicle sold in the U.S. An EPA official told Edmunds.com's Green Car Advisor the agency is holding the public meetings - another in Los Angeles is scheduled for Oct. 21 - to increase the breadth of input the EPA gathers on the matter. In addition to the public sessions, the official said the EPA has received thousands of written comments.

More details from the meeting are available at Green Car Advisor.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

LEAVE A COMMENT

mcnaughton says: 1:48 PM, 10.18.10

The letter grades are offensive. I applaud providing information, but grading consumers' vehicles choices is inappropriate at best: http://wp.me/pGyRI-jy

McNaughton Automotive Perspectives
http://autoperspectives.com

guy1974 says: 1:00 PM, 10.19.10

Crap - grading is used to shop the energy efficiency of kitchen appliance in Europe and even homes for resale. Why not cars. I am a car guy and the grade does not reflect on the cars main attributes like styling, handling, ride, performance - only fuel economy. Since fuel economy is very objective it is easy to have bands with grades that easily show the relative fuel efficiency.

How can you object to grades when you already have the fuel conomy measured with a 30 being better than 27. So why not an A vs a B?

ADD A COMMENT

No HTML or javascript allowed. URLs will not be hyperlinked.